Though Venugopal says discrete manufacturing processes are moving faster to Industry 4.0, two integrated manufacturing facilities in India that have been awarded the Lighthouse status by the World Economic Forum, are steelmaker Tata Steel’s Kalinganagar and Jamshedpur sites. This is a recognition given to manufacturing companies that adopt 4.0 technology at scale, with financial and operational impact.
The steel manufacturer has been using the technology for factory-floor processes and maintenance, and mining operations, besides corporate functions such as finance and administration. “We have used it across the organisation,” says Jayanta Banerjee, Group CIO, Tata Steel, “but 100% automation is still a few years of technological advancement away.” Right now, they are running with a human-machine intersection, where humans hold the reins and artificial intelligence assists.
It seems a modest summary of their Industry 4.0 implementation if we probe a bit deeper. There are 110 advanced analytics and AI algorithms running through the entire process, either assisting humans to take decisions or actually taking decisions. Around 1,500 critical pieces of equipment have sensors attached.
Starting with generating leads for sales, for which meeting clients was vital, many functions can now be done from the comfort of the office. For example, Tata Steel sells roofing sheets under the brand name Tata Shaktee. Earlier, sales staff had to travel even to remote areas to gauge the extent of demand. Today, they can check this through satellite imaging and know where potential customers are. “Not a single person has to move from their desk,” says Banerjee.
In their factories, they can keep track of the condition of their machines and which ones require maintenance, thus avoiding unplanned breakdowns. This is particularly important in a steel facility, where furnaces need to be in continuous operation. At their mining sites, they have dashboards that show the movement of load from the shaft to the pick-up vehicle, they can see if the load or the vehicle is kept waiting and remedy that. “The algorithm to optimise this process can be run from a mobile phone, so it can be done from Mumbai or it can be done from anywhere, and appropriate intervention can be taken at the mine,” says Banerjee.
At their blasting operations, they can check which drivers are hitting the pedal too often and too hard, thus driving up fuel costs. The driver can then be advised to apply optimal pressure and gradually break the rash-driving habit. They can also see who is falling asleep at the wheel, by tracking eye and head movements, sound a buzzer and avoid accidents. All the mining dumpers in the transportation fleet are sensorised, and this is managed from a virtual command centre. On the factory floor, algos can figure out the right mix of carbon and metal for the best alloy.
Tata Steel’s digital transformation journey began in 2018. Today, all their IT and corporate functions including manufacturing supervision, are remote-enabled and they have moved 85% of their infra to the cloud. “We have kept 10-15% of manufacturing functions such as execution systems on-premises to ensure there is not a single outage or failure of the network grid, owing to natural disasters such as a cyclone, because the steel mills run continuously,” he says.
Showing the way
There are various hurdles that stand in the way of widespread adoption of Industry 4.0. They are an old-school mindset, lack of technology and high cost of implementation. “All three play a role now,” says Banerjee, adding, “A steelmaker cannot imagine working a distance away from the physical asset. It is the most difficult thing for people of this industry and of many such industries to embrace. For technologists, this is easy.”
He recalls an incident from his three decades in the IT industry. When he started doing offshore work, American and European customers could not believe work could be done without any trouble from such a distance away. To prove his point, he asked them to give him a room in the building and let him coordinate from there, and asked them not to come and see him in person. He tried to simulate the time difference as well, between India and the client’s country, saying that he would call only after 6.30 pm or in the early morning hours. After two to three months of trying this out, without telling them, he traveled to India and called them from here. They were surprised but work had gone on smoothly, so there was no reason to complain. “You have to enable adoption of a new paradigm, it is tough and it takes time,” he says.
But Tata Steel is already ahead of its peers. “Digital transformation has a boardroom presence,” says Banerjee, “so it is a priority for the top management and the board.” On the technology front, he says that technologists have to think within the business context. That is, they should not just consider if the technology is available in the market but if it makes business sense for the company to adopt it. “Sometimes we reject a lot of software and a lot of technology early on because the cost is way higher than the benefit we can get out of it,” says Banerjee, “We have to wait for the technology cost also to come down.”
Prudence before jumping on to the bandwagon is advised by Bosch’s Venugopal too, particularly for smaller companies. “Digital needs upfront investment in technology. If you do ten experiments, maybe five or eight may give you the result you want. So large corporates, who can afford this, are good to go. But smaller companies, with Rs.1 billion or Rs.2 billion in revenue, given their limited resources, could wait and use only time-tested technologies,” he says.
In implementing digital-twin technology, Easwaran says one size does not fit all. “Large organisations can use it to manage their complexities and smaller organisations can use it to scale up capabilities,” he says. Post COVID, he has noticed a visible change in attitude towards this technology among traditional companies. “Before, they were not seeing any significant value. But after the pandemic, with remote working made possible, they are sensing the importance of this tech. During the pandemic, those who had been more open to digital adoption could more easily adapt with minimum disruption. They had better utilisation ratios.”
He is more optimistic about fully autonomous organisations. He believes the cost of the technology will fall dramatically over the next few years, particularly with the government’s push to promote local manufacturing. This will make the economics of Industry 4.0 more attractive.
In 2018, a study by the World Economic Forum, in collaboration with AT Kearney, looked into the readiness of 100 countries — that account for 96% of global GDP — to make the best of Industry 4.0. They found 25 countries mostly in Europe, North America and East Asia “well positioned” but found that a majority of the economies, about 58 countries, had “low level of readiness.” Ten economies, which included India, fell in the Legacy category. It meant they had a strong production base — because of advantages such as low wages — but these economies were at risk because they lacked the support system that could help them make the best of these technologies.
As a country, we need to move fast or lose out. It is not easy to predict the level of Industry 4.0 adoption in India, says Venugopal. “But we can start by saying that the ship has set sail and there is no return,” he adds.