On the policy front, the government has been active—amending e-waste and battery rules, and launching the EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) portal. This portal brings visibility into recycling targets and recycler capabilities.
However, operationally, many recyclers lack the expertise to go beyond dismantling and into refining. Hydrometallurgy is a complex process where efficiency is critical. We began at 35% metal recovery efficiency; after three years of R&D, we reached 95%.
With e-waste and batteries priced based on LME rates, margins are tight—so process efficiency becomes the only lever. Currently, the e-waste and battery management rules do not specifically support rare earth recovery. While EPR helps, there are cost disputes. For instance, recyclers earn ₹22/kg in recycling credits, but producers want to pay only ₹4/kg—this makes it unviable for recyclers.
To scale up, India needs to create a reverse logistics system for high-value components. But major barriers remain: technological gaps, lack of component traceability, and variable recovery efficiency. While BARC provides the core plasma furnace tech, recyclers must still develop their own metal extraction processes.
Key policy priorities should include:
- Making OEMs accountable for end-of-life product take-back
- Expanding recycling infrastructure via collaborations with BARC
- Investing in in-house R&D labs to boost recovery efficiency
- Building traceable systems like battery passports
- Offering targeted incentives to recyclers
Our own R&D team—22 members strong, including PhDs and IIT-trained metallurgists—was instrumental in boosting our recovery efficiency. Building such internal capability is essential for a profitable, scalable rare earth recycling industry in India.