Robert Hagstrom, chief investment strategist at Legg Mason Investment Counsel, has always exhibited a keen interest in understanding what lies behind the scenes. His first book, The Warren Buffett Way, spent 21 weeks on The New York Times bestseller list and sold over 1 million copies. Outside the United States, The Warren Buffett Way still continues to be the book most commonly mentioned by young investors as the source from which they initially learnt about Buffett’s methodology. Hagstrom’s latest book, his eighth, is titled Investing: The Last Liberal Art
In the spring of 1998, Carol Loomis wrote an article for Fortune, titled “The Inside Story of Warren Buffett”. It was the first full profile of Buffett and Loomis was the perfect writer for the story. Up until then, the only inside look of Buffett came from his Chairman’s Letters and his once-a-year appearance at Berkshire’s annual meeting at Omaha. But those who were aware that Loomis was a close friend of Buffett and had been editing the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Reports since 1977 knew if anyone could write an “inside” story on Buffett, it would be she.
Loomis said she wanted to write a different story, one that emphasised Buffett not just as an investor but also as an “extraordinary businessman”. She did not disappoint. It was a beautifully written 7,000-word article that indeed gave the Buffett faithful a more intimate look at the man now dubbed the Wizard of Omaha. Loomis gave us many insights, but none were more ground-shaking for me than three little sentences tucked neatly inside the article. “What we do is not beyond anybody else’s competence,” said Buffett. “I feel the same way about managing that I do about investing: It’s just not necessary to do extraordinary things to get extraordinary results.”
Now, I am sure many who read this chalked it up to Buffett’s Midwestern humility. Buffett is not a braggart. But nor does he mislead. I was sure he would have not made this statement if he did not believe it to be true. And if it were true, as I believed it was, it meant there was the possibility of uncovering a roadmap, or better yet, a treasure map, which would describe how Buffett thinks about investing in general and stock selection specifically. This was my motivation for writing The Warren Buffett Way.
The principle challenge I faced in writing the book was to prove or disprove Buffett’s confession that “what [I] do is not beyond anybody else’s competence”. Some critics argue that, despite his success, Buffett’s idiosyncrasies prevent his investment approach from being widely adopted. I disagreed. Buffett is idiosyncratic — it is the source of his success — but I have argued that his methodology, once understood, is applicable to both individual and institutional investors alike. It is the goal of the book to help investors employ the strategies that I believe made Warren Buffett successful.
Still, there were sceptics. The major pushback we have received over the years is that reading a book about Warren Buffett will not ensure you will be able to generate the same investment returns that Buffett achieved. One, I never insinuated that by reading the book an individual could achieve the same investment returns as Buffett. Two, I was puzzled why anyone would think so. It seemed to me that if you bought a book about how to play golf like Tiger Woods, you shouldn’t expect to become Tiger’s equal on the golf course. You read the book because you believe there are some tips in the book that will help improve your game. The same is true of The Warren Buffett Way. If by reading the book, you pick up some lessons that help improve your investment results, then the book is a success. Considering how poorly most people perform in the stock market, achieving some improvement will not be a herculean task.
It has been 20 years since the first edition of The Warren Buffett Way was published. The success of the book is first and foremost a testament to Warren Buffett. His wit, integrity and intellectual spirit have charmed millions of investors worldwide. It is an unparalleled combination that makes Buffett the single most popular model in investing today and the greatest investor in history.
But, I do have one regret. Despite Buffett’s celebrity and the amount written about how Buffett invests, I am disappointed that there are not millions and millions of individuals who apply his investment approach. I have met no one who has told me Buffett’s investment principles are invalid. The millions of investors I speak of could all apply Buffett’s investment tenets. You don’t have to be an MBA-trained security analyst nor do you have to write complex computer code to decide which company you want to invest in. I strongly believe that applying Buffett’s tenets “is not beyond anybody else’s competence”. So, what prevents so many investors, who I am sure would like to invest like Warren Buffett, to actually invest like Warren Buffett?
According to those that know Buffett the best, the answer is “rationality”. Charlie Munger, vice-chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and Buffett’s intellectual partner for almost 50 years, tells us that Buffett’s “brain is a superbly rational mechanism”. Loomis concurs, telling me “rationality is the single most important trait in his investment success”. And Roger Lowenstein, author of Buffett: The Making of an American Capitalist, wrote, “Buffett’s genius is largely a genius of character — of patience, discipline, and rationality.”
Rationalism, according to The Oxford American Dictionary, is a belief that one’s opinions or actions should be based on reason and knowledge rather than emotional responses. A rational person thinks clearly, sensibly and logically. A rational person seeks to achieve one’s life goals using the best means possible. If you fail to achieve your stated goal, it is because you have succumbed to the many heuristics and biases that prevent individuals from making optimal decisions.
For Buffett, the best means possible for growing one’s networth is to buy a concentrated, low-turnover portfolio of high quality businesses selling at prices below intrinsic value and ignore the day-to-day vagaries of the economy and the stock market. Never mind that most investors are consumed thinking about the economy and the stock market and, as a result, are constantly buying and selling stocks. Never mind that owning a concentrated portfolio with fewer companies will subject the investor to higher volatility than a broadly diversified portfolio. In fact, one of the hallmarks of being a rational investor is the ability to handle volatility and the wide swings in market prices equably. If you panic due to volatility and abandon the market, you have succumbed to myopic loss aversion and can no longer call yourself rational.
Stanovich believes humans process information poorly. When solving a problem, he says, people have different cognitive mechanisms to choose from. At one end of the thinking spectrum are mechanisms that have great computational power. But this great computational power comes with a cost. It is a slower process of thinking and requires great concentration. At the opposite end of the thinking spectrum are mechanisms with very little computational power; they require little concentration and permit quick decisions. Overall, “humans are cognitive misers,” writes Stanovich, because our basic tendency is to default to the processing mechanisms that require less computational effort, even if they are less accurate. In a word, humans are lazy thinkers; as a result, their solutions are often illogical.
Buffett has often said “investing is easier than you think but harder than it looks”. When he talks about the “easier than you think” part, he reminds us we don’t have to spend countless hours worrying about the economy, pontificating about what will happen next in the stock market. The “harder than it looks” part is his gentle reminder that doing simple accounting ratios (price to earnings ratios, dividend yields, price to book value) are not enough to determine value, no matter how easy they are to calculate. If you want to determine the value of a company you will have to apply the investment tenets Buffett has outlined over the years. But remember, working your way through the business tenets, management tenets, financial tenets and market tenets is not equivalent to studying quantum mechanics. However, it does require a little effort on your part and if you are a “cognitive miser”, you may never be successful applying The Warren Buffett Way.
In Carol Loomis’ new book, Tap Dancing to Work: Warren Buffett on Practically Everything, 1966-2012, she quotes Buffett who is answering a question from a student who wants to know how he became successful. “How I got here is pretty simple in my case. It’s not IQ, I am sure you will be glad to hear. The big thing is rationality. I always look at IQ and talent as representing the horsepower of the motor, but the output — the efficiency with which the motor works — depends on rationality. A lot of people start out with 400 horsepower motors but only get 100 horsepower of rationality. It is way better to have a 200 horsepower motor and get it all in output.”
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT